Part One: -4
Since September 10, 2008 I saw the way they did things, I decided to bring forward the release of four years and a handful of months: the approaching end of the world will be in 2012. Exactly 21 December 2012. Precise on the time you are informing the proper authorities. I hope it is around fifteen, which at that time I sleep and I never take anything to be done.
See that the 2012 will not be an end of the world like that of September 10. There are substantial differences that must be taken not to list them in the leg and I see from the end of the world most recently, the 2008 short.
The methods of the last Holocaust survivor are now well-established ones of the present age, that are managed by technology.
-La first occurred in the '40s when a handful of physicists (led by Dr Death) participated in the Manhattan Project. On that occasion a Teller predicted that the explosion of an atomic bomb would set fire to the atmosphere and caused serious damage to the human species which included the extinction and melanomas. Teller was wrong and in fact, contrary to psychosis world, the atomic bomb was the effect the revival of circus freaks in the world.
-The second world catastrophe of 900 came in 2000 (Ah), in which our civilization would have collapsed because of the Millennium Bug and our dependence on computers. In fact nothing happened, apart from the fact that the computer companies cashed in billions to upgrade the computer that did not require updates. The only disaster that was taken in the leg that year was the airing of Big Brother in Italy and to see now is a great pity that the Millennium Bug was not anything. The third-
catastrophe (but smaller than, a catastrofetta) occurred in 2001. Some thought that the Millennium Bug would come that year since it opened the new millennium. But no. On the other hand was airing the second edition of Big Brother.
-The fourth is the most recent disaster, which is the black hole at Cern. He's already said enough and I do not want bore you with a useless guide of events. In any case, over which humanity has it also done time.
-In preview I can reveal that the next disaster will happen with technology in 2038, when the bug will be the master of 2038. As part of the same family as the Millennium Bug, this of 2038 will be another worthy opponent of computers around the world. Reliable information we have received through John Titor, a time traveler from 2036 that came and went in our present (at the edge of a DeLorean) to fix the bug in its future. Among the many reports that this time traveler left us stands the nuclear holocaust of 2015. So we're down to six.
As I mentioned before, the aberrant nature of these misfortunes of the contemporary age are not based on the inevitability of fate, but rather are a mixture of: divine punishment, social decay but above human fallibility. In fact in all these cases, the agent that threatens humanity is the same man in the form of a group of mad scientists assisted by Dr. Death.
course the classic elements of a disaster there are all standard (except the Holocaust mean) even though distinguishable in two cases.
The first event is the most disturbing or destroying the planet. Apparently, this concept is with extreme experimentation with disruptive technologies. In the specific cases cited above, which use technology in some way large amounts of energy. But this is only a first side, because the psychosis is generated when the technologies in question are to recreate the extreme natural conditions. In fact, the atomic bomb take "inspiration" from the study of reactions occurring in stars, while the experiments at CERN are based on cosmic rays and their sockets (and where they will land we will find out only later, trivially thing that happens with almost all the innovative experiments ). We therefore fixed points: the man defies nature, nature is too much for the man, the man is destroyed without appeal.
In the second case, which is denoted in the examples above, shall not constitute the destruction of the planet, but simply declined humanity, confused and probably started to become brutal. The mechanism is simple: man relies on his wits, the man defers to his needs with the machines and then to his wit, ingenuity flaw, the man finds himself starting over in a hostile environment. Usually this type of apocalypse is taken as the slightest chance to redeem himself for humanity, that is to create a new society free from past mistakes. On close a losing battle when you decide to recreate a company and this shows us that if apocalypse must be, better a well-made with no possibility of escape.
Not least among the disaster-sweeps humanity there is one particular: the climatic upheaval. Of course implemented by man. Paradoxically, this is the real tragedy that can strike most of humanity, but nevertheless does not receive the media coverage that would require and, strangest thing, does not trigger psychosis. The conclusions that can be drawn from these disasters are simple: the man does not trust his fellow men but also has terribly afraid of dying.
If you have noticed, with the climatic upheaval has risen to seven disasters that man he feared in these recent times. Not to worry, but I leave a note. From Wikipedia: 7. Take it as an anticipation of the second part.
Semicontemporanea with MenteCritica
0 comments:
Post a Comment